At the 2026 Golden Globe Awards, Mark Ruffalo arrived expecting to celebrate his work as an actor. Instead, one small pin on his tuxedo helped turn his red-carpet appearance into a national political controversy.
The actor wore a black-and-white “BE GOOD” pin, part of a campaign honoring Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old woman who was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Several other celebrities also wore “BE GOOD” or “ICE OUT” buttons that night, including Jean Smart, Wanda Sykes, Ariana Grande and Natasha Lyonne.
When reporters asked Ruffalo what the pin meant, he said it was for Good and then launched into a broader criticism of the Trump administration.
“This is for Renee Nicole Good,” Ruffalo told reporters, before saying he believed Americans were frightened by what was happening in the country. He also criticized U.S. policy toward Venezuela and accused Vice President JD Vance of misrepresenting events surrounding Good’s death.
Then Ruffalo turned directly to President Donald Trump.
His language became much more severe.
Ruffalo pointed to Trump’s criminal conviction and the civil verdict involving writer E. Jean Carroll before calling Trump the “worst human being.” He also used the terms “rapist” and “pedophile” while criticizing the president’s morality.
Those statements quickly spread far beyond the Golden Globes.
Some supporters of Ruffalo praised him for using a high-profile entertainment event to express his political views. Others argued that the red carpet was not an appropriate place for such accusations, particularly where Ruffalo’s language went beyond what had actually been established in court.
That distinction matters.
Trump was convicted in New York in May 2024 on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The case concerned business records connected to reimbursement for a hush-money payment made before the 2016 election. Trump denied wrongdoing and has challenged the case.
Separately, a federal civil jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll. The case was civil rather than criminal, meaning Trump was not criminally convicted of rape or another sex offense in that proceeding. A federal appeals court later upheld the $5 million judgment.
There is also no criminal charge or conviction establishing Ruffalo’s allegation that Trump is a “pedophile.” Reporting on the controversy specifically noted that Trump has never been charged with or convicted of a crime involving pedophilia.
So while Ruffalo was entitled to criticize the president and refer to established legal findings, some of the labels he used were political accusations rather than accurate descriptions of Trump’s criminal record.
That became central to the White House response.
Steven Cheung, the White House communications director and an assistant to the president, responded publicly on X after Ruffalo’s remarks circulated.
Rather than issuing a lengthy point-by-point rebuttal, Cheung attacked Ruffalo personally.
“Poor thing Mark Ruffalo, star of She-Hulk, is one of the worst actors in the business,” Cheung wrote.
He continued by calling Ruffalo an even worse person and accusing him of “spewing outright lies,” while adding a mocking reference to Ruffalo’s performance in She-Hulk. The White House later directed reporters asking about Ruffalo’s comments to Cheung’s post.
The exchange immediately became another example of the sharp relationship between Hollywood activists and the Trump White House.
But the dispute did not begin with Ruffalo’s comments about Trump.
It began with the death of Renee Nicole Good.
Good was shot and killed during an encounter with immigration agents in Minneapolis on January 7.
Video from the incident showed Good sitting in a vehicle while agents approached. One officer attempted to open the vehicle’s door. Good then moved the vehicle, first backing up and then driving forward. ICE agent Jonathan Ross fired during the encounter.
The exact interpretation of those moments became intensely disputed.
The Department of Homeland Security said Good had used her vehicle as a weapon and that Ross fired in defense of himself and others. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem described Good’s conduct as an attempt to run over officers.
Other analyses of available video questioned parts of that description.
CNN synchronized multiple camera angles and reported that Good appeared to turn the steering wheel away while accelerating. In one angle, the vehicle came close to Ross, while another angle raised questions about whether he was directly in the vehicle’s path at the moment he fired.
That conflicting interpretation of the video fueled protests and political arguments almost immediately.
Supporters of the administration focused on the danger officers can face when vehicles move toward or near them during enforcement actions.
Critics questioned whether the shooting was necessary and challenged the administration’s description of Good as an aggressor.
Ruffalo clearly aligned himself with the latter interpretation.
At the Golden Globes, he described Good’s death using the language of murder. That characterization reflected his political view of the shooting; it was not a judicial determination.
The “BE GOOD” campaign itself extended beyond Ruffalo.
According to coverage of the Golden Globes, the campaign was created in honor of Good and Keith Porter, who had also been killed in an incident involving an off-duty ICE agent. Organizers described the message as a call for people to be better citizens, neighbors and allies during a period of intense political division.
Jean Smart also spoke publicly about the political atmosphere while attending the ceremony.
Rather than using Ruffalo’s confrontational language, Smart emphasized restraint and courage, saying she believed the country was at a turning point and that people needed to remain levelheaded.
Ruffalo took a more direct approach.
He said he wanted to enjoy the ceremony and was proud of his Golden Globe nomination, but that he felt the political situation had become impossible to ignore.
The actor had been nominated for his performance in HBO’s crime drama Task. He ultimately lost the award to Noah Wyle for The Pitt.
Yet by the following morning, his nomination was no longer the main reason his name was trending.
His comments about Trump were.
Ruffalo has long been politically outspoken, particularly on environmental issues, immigration, Democratic politics and opposition to Trump.
The 2026 Golden Globes confrontation therefore did not emerge from nowhere.
What made this instance especially notable was the combination of three things: the setting, the language Ruffalo used, and the unusually personal nature of the official response.
White House communications offices traditionally respond to criticism by defending policy, disputing facts or dismissing an opponent’s argument.
Cheung instead mocked Ruffalo’s acting career.
His reference to She-Hulk was particularly pointed because Ruffalo plays Bruce Banner, or the Hulk, in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and appeared in the Disney+ series She-Hulk: Attorney at Law.
The response therefore blended political communication with celebrity insult.
Supporters of Trump’s combative communication style often appreciate that approach because it rejects the restrained language traditionally associated with political press offices.
Critics argue that it lowers the tone of official government communication and shifts attention away from substantive policy disputes.
The episode offered examples of both approaches.
Ruffalo made a political argument about immigration enforcement, presidential conduct and international law.
Cheung responded by accusing him of lying but devoted much of the post to mocking him personally.
Neither side attempted anything resembling a conventional policy debate.
The exchange became cultural combat.
That is one reason it spread so quickly.
The legal details underneath Ruffalo’s statements also became important because several different Trump cases are often blended together in social-media discussion.
The New York criminal case produced the 34 felony convictions.
The Carroll proceedings were civil cases.
One jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and awarded Carroll $5 million. Another jury later awarded Carroll more than $83 million in a separate defamation proceeding. Trump has fought those cases through appeals.
Calling Trump a “convicted felon” therefore has a clear factual basis in the New York verdict.
Calling him a “convicted rapist,” however, does not accurately describe the legal record, because the Carroll case was civil rather than a criminal conviction.
And Ruffalo’s allegation of pedophilia is not supported by a criminal charge or conviction.
That does not prevent Ruffalo or anyone else from expressing harsh opinions about a political leader.
But it does make the difference between opinion, allegation, civil liability and criminal conviction especially important.
The same careful distinction applies to the Good shooting.
Good was killed.
Ross fired the shots.
Video exists.
The government has defended his conduct as justified.
Critics have strongly disputed that interpretation.
But calling the shooting murder is a conclusion about criminal culpability that requires a legal determination, not simply a political opinion.
That nuance was largely absent from the Golden Globes exchange.
Instead, two different political narratives collided.
Ruffalo portrayed Good’s death as evidence of a government using immigration enforcement in a frightening and dangerous way.
The administration portrayed agents as facing threats while carrying out federal law and defended Ross’s actions as self-defense.
The disagreement reflects a much broader national dispute about immigration enforcement under Trump.
Federal immigration operations expanded significantly after Trump returned to office, leading to protests, court challenges and confrontations in several cities.
The Minneapolis shooting intensified that debate because of the widely circulated video.
For people already critical of ICE, Good became a symbol of what they considered excessive enforcement.
For supporters of immigration agents, the incident became another example of officers facing unpredictable risks during enforcement actions.
Ruffalo’s pin compressed all of those arguments into two words:
“BE GOOD.”
What followed showed how little agreement remained over what those words meant in practice.
To Ruffalo, being good meant speaking publicly against what he viewed as abusive government conduct.
To Cheung and Trump’s supporters, Ruffalo’s comments represented reckless accusations and misinformation directed at an elected president and federal officers.
The controversy also raised an old question about celebrities and politics.
Should actors use awards shows to make political statements?
There is no objective answer.
Hollywood awards ceremonies have been political for decades.
Actors have spoken about wars, civil rights, abortion, LGBTQ rights, immigration, climate policy and presidential administrations.
Some viewers appreciate those interventions.
Others believe entertainment events should remain separate from politics.
Ruffalo clearly falls into the first camp.
His comments made clear that he believed remaining quiet would itself be a choice.
The White House clearly believed his remarks deserved an aggressive response.
By the end of the controversy, however, the most important facts were somewhat less dramatic than the viral headlines.
Renee Nicole Good, 37, was killed by an ICE agent during a January 7 confrontation in Minneapolis. The administration defended the shooting, while critics challenged that account based partly on video evidence.
Ruffalo wore a pin honoring Good at the January 11 Golden Globes and sharply criticized Trump, Vance and federal immigration enforcement.
Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in 2024.
A civil jury separately found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, but that was not a criminal conviction for rape or another sex crime.
Trump has not been charged with or convicted of pedophilia, despite Ruffalo’s allegation.
And Steven Cheung responded for the White House by accusing Ruffalo of spreading falsehoods while also mocking his acting career.
Those distinctions can disappear quickly once a political argument goes viral.
One side sees a Hollywood actor courageously speaking out.
Another sees a celebrity spreading unsupported allegations.
One side sees a fatal shooting as evidence of excessive force.
Another sees an officer acting in self-defense.
And between those competing interpretations sits a collection of facts that deserve to be kept separate from rhetoric.
That may be the most important part of the entire episode.
The Golden Globes provided the stage.
Ruffalo provided the accusation.
The White House provided the counterattack.
But underneath the insults were serious questions about immigration enforcement, the use of force, presidential conduct, the accuracy of public claims and the increasingly personal nature of American political debate.
Those questions lasted far longer than one red-carpet interview.
And by the morning after the ceremony, a tiny “BE GOOD” pin had become one of the most politically charged accessories of awards season.
THE END! THANKS FOR READING!